Coal = DIAMAAAAAANDS

No, diamonds are NOT made of coal. Forming coal is a multi-million year process, the oldest specimens tracked back to 300 to 400 million years ago. Diamonds, however have been found to have been made 1–3 billion years ago. Besides this time difference, there is another reason why diamonds aren't made from coal. Diamonds come from a pure element - carbon. Yes it's true that coal is made mostly of carbon, but "mostly" doesn't cut it! Because it is made of multiple elements, coal has many impurities. Impurities are the enemy of a nice, clean, sharp, diamond. This means that "at the most can change its chemical composition and transform into its nearly purest form which is Graphite but not diamond. The conversion of coal into diamond is almost impossible due to its impurities" (todayifoundout.com). IN ADDITION, the pressure needed for diamonds to form is found only 87 to 120 miles deep into the Earth's crust. Coal is rarely ever found deeper than 2 miles, so in other words:
Are diamonds made of coal?

Verdict: FALSE

Flushed away

 

 Okay, so a belief is held that a toilet will flush water counter-clockwise in the Southern Hemisphere, and clockwise in the Northern Hemisphere. This is then often attributed to the Coriolis effect and said to be completely verified and backed up by videos online of American and Australian toilets flushing in different directions. However, this is a great misconception. The Coriolis effect* can't actually be the reason for this though. It doesn't make sense because  "toilets—and even tornadoes—are too small to be affected by the Coriolis, whose force would only begin to directly influence a storm's swirling mass if it were approximately three times larger than the supercell storm systems that typically generate tornadoes" (www.scientificamerican.com). So why the change? Well, I can't be sure of the origin of this myth. However, the reason toilets flush in different directions could be due to the manufacturers.

*The Coriolis effect is "an apparent force which describes how objects veer to the left or right when traveling on something that’s rotating" (www.sciencegeekgirl.com).

Could a T-rex see YOU?

In dinosaur movies like "Jurassic Park", there is a recurring idea for a scene. To avoid being spotted when the monster comes near, you MUST. STAY. STILL. But would this really work with a T-Rex? Is a T-Rex' eyesight, REALLY that bad?
Well;
"The T-Rex may well have had visual clarity up to 13 times better than a modern human. For reference, an eagle has about 3.6 times the visual clarity of a person. Additionally, it was determined that a T-Rex’s vision allowed an object to remain relatively clear up to six kilometers away. For humans, it’s only about 1.6 kilometers for the same clarity. As [Professor Kent Stevens] put it, “With the size of its eyeballs, (the T-Rex) couldn’t help but have excellent vision”"
(todayifoundout.com).

So... a T-Rex has really good eyesight. Like, ridiculously good. And, even if they didn't have the best eyesight, this myth is still on shaky ground. The T-Rex were predators, and if they could really be stumped just by standing still... I mean, come on! Besides, people can't stand completely still. I mean just look at the gif. If you were to confront a dinosaur, there is no way you wouldn't be at least somewhat jittery! So, I mean, in any case:

Verdict: FALSE

Sugar Happy!

Lollipops, chocolate, cake, and more sugary delights: a little kid's favorite snacks... And a parent's headache. They worry that their kids will get a sugar rush, and be hyper. But is this true at all? Nope. I mean, it might cause a shorter attention span according to a study conducted by a Dr. Wesnes, but not hyperactivity. In fact, "through various experiments over the years, scientists have discovered that no substantial evidence exists to support the claim that sugar causes hyperactivity" (http://www.yalescientific.org).

So why did people start believing this? I can see why a parent might make this connection. I LOVE candy and sugar, whenever I see a see a sweet, sugary concoction being presented before me, I get really happy like:

So maybe parents made this connection based on kids' reaction to sweets? Or maybe its an excuse not to indulge kids with late night snacks? Either way, once eaten, the sugary sweets can't physically cause hyperactivity. Do with this info as you will. I'm gonna go eat a honey bun. And a cheesecake slice. And maybe a chocolate bar.

Verdict: FALSE